Gallery of log for Gungahlin Trig
Clearly you're not familiar with the site. Follow this link (http://www.actmapi.act.gov.au/commands/viewlinkedinfo/surveycontrolmarks/survey_control_marks_list.asp)and you'll see that trig stations are identified by ACTPLA using the 'MC' code in the database. I've also done another today which doesn't meet YOUR criteria but which is actually referred to in legislation as a trig point. I look forward to your argument against that one. All that aside you guys need to put away your home made trig police badges and find something to do rather than disputing others legitimate caches. Your debate is not with me it's with ACTPLA. Obviously your combined knowledge and experience exceeds theirs. I don't just find stuff in the bush and call it a trig I identify trigs via research and then go there to log them. I believe the GCA forum moderators adjudicated on this issue previously and said that if I believe it is a trig it is; if you believe it's not then it's not. It is not my business or your business to pass judgement on these matters. If you don't believe someone else's trig is valid then don't go there! You don't have the authority to dictate what people do in this community. I recall you previously disputed the 'Sparrow Hill' trig point but have changed your position (pardon the pun) on that one.
I've provided some evidence suggesting the Gungahlin point is a trig and you pair have provided nothing credible to the contrary. If you can I'd certainly appreciate that but until then it remains a trig as far as I'm concerned. Everyone in here has different views of what constitues a trig and provided they have some evidence to support their view leave it alone. As for this cache being relegated to a survey mark, by whom and based on what evidence?
You really need to rethink what GCA is all about and what your role should NOT be in this community because shooting down others efforts based on nothing substantial is pretty lame.
Incidentally, the Gungahlin trig does have a bolt concreted in the ground but the photo didn't work out.
I've provided some evidence suggesting the Gungahlin point is a trig and you pair have provided nothing credible to the contrary. If you can I'd certainly appreciate that but until then it remains a trig as far as I'm concerned. Everyone in here has different views of what constitues a trig and provided they have some evidence to support their view leave it alone. As for this cache being relegated to a survey mark, by whom and based on what evidence?
You really need to rethink what GCA is all about and what your role should NOT be in this community because shooting down others efforts based on nothing substantial is pretty lame.
Incidentally, the Gungahlin trig does have a bolt concreted in the ground but the photo didn't work out.